Kundu Smita S., Digvijaysinh G. Rana∗
Department of Pharmacology, Babaria Institute of Pharmacy, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
*Address for Corresponding Author
Digvijaysinh G. Rana
Department of Pharmacology, Babaria Institute of Pharmacy, Vadodara, Gujarat - 391240, India
Depression is a chronic syndrome with a pathogenesis linked to various genetic, biological, and environmental factors. Several links between gut microbiota and depression have been established in animal models. In humans, however, few correlations have yet been demonstrated. There is a growing emphasis on the relationship between the complexity and diversity of the microorganisms that inhabit gastrointestinal microbiota and health/disease, including brain health and disorders of the central nervous system. It has been demonstrated that changes in the gut environment can lead to a broad spectrum of physiological and behavioral effects including hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activation and altered activity of neurotransmitter systems and immune function. Further, it has been demonstrated that microbiota could be an important in normal healthy brain function. Moreover, the relation between stress and microbiota and how alterations in microbiota influence stress related behaviors has been discussed. It has been demonstrated that bacteria including psychobiotics, probiotics and prebiotics in the gastrointestinal tract could activate neural pathways and central nervous system signaling systems. It is possible that probiotic and prebiotic could affect on emotional, cognitive, systemic and neural variables may be relevant to health and disease. In this review, it has been tried to discuss the role of gut microbiota in brain and depression. It can be concluded from the literature review that utilization of gut microbiota data may provide novel approaches for prevention and treatment of mental illness including depression.
Keywords: Depression, gut microbiota, psychobiotics, probiotics, prebiotics
Depression is a multi-factorial disease being caused by biological, psychological, and social factors. It is the leading cause of ill health and disability worldwide (Uher, 2010). Despite current and newer drugs being used in depression there is either relapses occur frequently or the treatment does not seem to be very effective. There is a need to develop newer concept or treatment options that are more effective with lesser side effects. In light of this, significant interests have evolved on the gut microbiota in the recent years within the scientific community. Gut microbiota have been associated with a large array of human diseases ranging from luminal diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (Ferreira et al., 2014) and irritable bowel syndrome (Kennedy et al., 2014), metabolic diseases such obesity and diabetes (Karlsson et al., 2013), allergic disease (Bisgaard et al., 2011) to neuro-developmental illnesses, though the strength of evidence is not robust with many of them.
Different roles of gut microbiota
Role of gut microflora in normal function of in the body
Microbiota refers to the entire population of microorganisms that colonizes a particular location and includes not just bacteria, but also other microbes such as fungi, archaea, viruses, and protozoa (Sekirov et al., 2010). The large body of evidences reported that gut microbiota bear significant functional role in maintaining the gut in the normal individual and human health as a whole (Jandhyala et al., 2015). From an immunological perspective, microorganisms are viewed as pathogens by the host immune system that recognizes and eliminates them. However, majority of the gut bacteria are non-pathogenic and co-habit with the enterocytes in a symbiotic relationship. The gut microorganisms predominantly aid in nutrient metabolism, drug metabolism, prevention of colonization of pathogenic microorganisms and in intestinal barrier function. At the same time, the immune system has co-evolved to live in a collaborative relationship with the healthy microbiota, while serving its function to fight off invasive pathogenic microorganisms (Jandhyala et al., 2015).
Role of gut microbiota in nutrient metabolism
The gut microbiota largely derives their nutrients from dietary carbohydrates. Fermentation of the carbohydrates that escaped proximal digestion and indigestible oligosaccharides by colonic organisms result in the synthesis of short chain fatty acids (Macfarlane, 2003; Sartor, 2008). Members of the genus Bacteroides which are the predominant organisms that participate in carbohydrate metabolism, perform this by expressing enzymes such as glycosyl transferases, glycoside hydrolases and polysaccharide lyases (Jandhyala et al., 2015). The gut microbiota has shown to impart a positive impact on lipid metabolism by suppressing the inhibition of lipoprotein lipase activity in adipocytes (Hooper et al., 2001). The gut microbiota is also enriched with an efficient protein metabolizing machinery that function via the microbial proteinases and peptidases in tandem with human proteinases. Synthesis of vitamin K and several components of vitamin B is another major metabolic function of the gut microbiota (Jandhyala et al., 2015). Members of genus Bacteroides have been shown to synthesize conjugated linoleic acid that is known to be antidiabetic, antiatherogenic, antiobesogenic, hypolipidemic and have immunomodulatory properties (Badddini et al., 2009; Devillard et al., 2007; Devillard et al., 2009). The gut microbiota, especially Bacteroides intestinalis and to a certain extent Bacteroides fragilis and E. coli, also has the capacity to deconjugate and dehydrate the primary bile acids and convert them into the secondary bile acids deoxycholic and lithocolic acids in the human colon (Fuvika et al., 2009).
Role of gut microbiota in Xenobiotic and drug metabolism
A large body of evidences has provided sufficient insights on the role of the gut microbiota on xenobiotic metabolism which could have profound impact on therapy for various diseases in future. It has been reported that a gut microbial metabolite p-cresol can reduce the capacity of the liver to metabolize acetaminophen due to competitive inhibition of hepatic sulfotransferases (Clayton et al., 2009). Furthermore, cardiac glycosides like digoxin have been recently shown to up-regulate a cytochrome containing operon in the common organism eggerthella lenta from the actinobacteria phyla, which results in inactivation of digoxin (Saha et al., 1983). Further, it has been reported that microbiome induced drug metabolism is the microbial β-glucoronidase induced deconjugation of the anticancer drug irinotecan that can contribute to its toxicities such as diarrhea, inflammation and anorexia (Wallace et al., 2010).
Role of gut microbiota in antimicrobial protection
The requirement of a healthy gut microbiota for normal homeostasis puts the gut mucosal immune system in a challenging situation in that it needs to be tolerant to the beneficial commensals and yet prevent overgrowth of the resident pathogens. One of the simplest mechanisms of antimicrobial protection is the presence of the two-tiered mucus layer which keeps luminal microbes away from epithelial contact, predominantly in the large intestine. Further, goblet cells also produce factors like trefoil-factor and the resistin-like molecule-β that can stabilize mucin polymers and thereby maintain barrier integrity (Artis et al., 2004; Podolsky et al., 1993).
Role of gut microbiota in Immunomodulation
The gut microbiota contribute to gut immunomodulation in tandem with both the innate and adaptive immune systems. The components and the cell types from the immune system that participate in the immunomodulatory process includes the gut associated lymphoid tissues, effector and regulatory T cells, IgA producing B cells, group three innate lymphoid cells and resident macrophages and dendritic cells in the lamina propria (Jandhyala et al., 2015).
Role of gut microbiota in integrity of the gut barrier and structure of the gastrointestinal tract
Currently, there is a convincing body of evidence that supports the role of the gut microbiota in maintaining the structure and function of the gastrointestinal tract. Bacteroides is reported to induce expression of the small proline rich protein 2A, which is required for maintenance of desmosomes at the epithelial villus (Lutgendorff et al., 2008). Another mechanism that maintains the tight junctions is by toll like receptor -2 (TLR2) mediated signaling that is stimulated by the microbial cell wall peptidoglycan (Cario et al., 2007). Furthermore, the lactobacillus rhamnosus strain produces two soluble proteins namely p40 and p75 that can prevent cytokine induced apoptosis of the intestinal epithelial cells in an epithelial growth factor receptor and protein kinase C pathway dependent manner (Yan et al., 2011). The endocannabinoid system is yet another entity that regulates gut microbiota mediated maintenance of the gut barrier function. e.g., the gram negative bacteria akkermansia muciniphilia can increase the levels of endocannabinoids that control gut barrier functions by decreasing metabolic endotoxemia (Cani et al., 2009). Other evidence that support role of gut microbiota in maintaining structure and function is obtained from that have a lower intestinal surface area (Gordon, 1961), thin villi (Banasaz et al., 2002), increase cell cycle time (Alam et al., 1994) and impaired peristalsis (Husebye et al., 1994). The gut microbiota can also modulate mucosal glycosylation patterns that are microbial attachment sites both at the cell surface and subcellular levels.
Role of gut microbiota in brain and depression
The development of the mammalian brain is an intricate process that lasts through adolescence and into early adulthood in humans. Further, the process of brain development involves large-scale long-distance migration of cells during fetal development to specific regions or layers, as well as navigation of their processes across even longer distances to build the specific circuits that underlie behavior (Geschwind, 2013; Marin, 2003). As the gut is our largest portal to the molecular universe, various dietary components have been shown to interact directly with the developing brain and to induce functional alterations in the mature brain and there is now mounting evidences for a role by the gut microbiome in directing and facilitating developmental processes in the brain with long term implications to health.
It has been hypothesized that there can be a profound impact of microbiome induced alterations of immmune system. It has been reported that germ-free mice, devoid of all associated microorganisms, exhibit increased risk-taking behaviors and hyperactivity while also displaying learning and memory deficits compared to conventional mice (Geschwind, 2013; Marin, 2003). Further, germ-free mice showed changes in expression of the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT1A), neurotrophic factors such as BDNF and NMDA receptor subunits in the hippocampus (Bercik et al., 2011a; Heijtz et al., 2011; Sudo et al., 2004) while also displaying impaired blood-brain barrier function as well as increased myelination in the prefrontal cortex (Braniste et al., 2014; Hoban et al., 2016). There is also evidence from animal models for a potential role for the microbiome in neuropsychiatric conditions including depression and anxiety (Foster, 2013), autism spectrum disorder (Krajmalnik-Brown et al., 2015), schizophrenia (Severance et al., 2014) and even Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (Keshavarzian et al., 2015).
Neurodevelopmental disorders are classically studied from a genetic perspective (De la Torre-Ubieta et al., 2016; Parikshak et al., 2015). However, gastrointestinal comorbidities and food allergies are common in neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting a role for the gut microbiome (De Theije et al., 2014). Thus, an appreciation for a microbial role in these conditions has been gained through profiling bacterial populations in fecal samples of patients and controls. Recent reports support the notion that the microbiome or its disruption can contribute to the pathology of various neurologic disorders, using mouse models and intervention studies (Sharon et al., 2016). Three general mechanisms have been suggested to describe how the gut microbiota inﬂuences depression, namely through inﬂammation or through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) or interference with neurotransmitter signaling (Foster, 2013).
Role of Microbiodata in neuroinflammation and depression
It has been reported that microbiota could stimulate cytokines and chemokines release which in turn regulates local levels of bacteria in the gut. As well as influencing local immune responses at the epithelium, microbiota can synthesise and release neurotransmitters as well as influence the release of neuropeptides and hormones from enteroendocrine cells of the intestines. Gut peptides such as ghrelin, gastrin, orexin, galanin, cholecystokinin, leptin and neuropeptide Y are thought to influence peripheral neural communication and can also act centrally to influence behaviour. Current hypotheses suggest that these circulating cytokines, chemokines, endocrine messengers and microbial by-products can infiltrate the blood and lymphatic systems or influence neural messages carried by the vagal and spinal afferent neurons to impact on centrally-mediated events including regulation of HPA axis activity and neuroinflammation (Rea et al., 2014).
The gastrointestinal microbiota plays a key role in HPA axis activity and immune response. It has been reported that bi-directional microbiome-gut-brain axis in homeostatic conditions and in response to changes in environment likely involve dynamic molecules with multiple effector mechanisms that can traverse different anatomical environments and communicate within their local environment to mediate a complex co-ordinated response on multiple physiological systems. Numerous molecular candidates have been proposed including neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, endocrine hormones and immunomodulators (Rea et al., 2014).
It has been reported that there is a likely involvement of the microbiota in mediating or modulating stress and neuroinflammation and their associated behavioural responses. There is a paucity of studies conclusively linking microbiota- mediated changes locally in the gut and periphery with central effects (Rea et al., 2014).
Effect of gut microbiota on HPA axis and its influence in depression
HPA is a neuro-endocrine stress response system, being important in both mood disorders and functional diseases. Alterations of the HPA system have been diagnosed in patients having different mental states including posttraumatic stress disorder (De Kloet et al., 2005), schizophrenia (Walker, 1997) social anxiety (Beaton et al., 2006) and depression (Holtzheimer, 2006).
Over the past few years, it has become clear that the guts microbiota plays a role in both the programming of the HPA axis early in life and stress reactivity over the lifespan. In a rat model, it has recently been reported that treatment with probiotic bacteria can interfere with the HPA response to acute physiological stress, suggesting a mechanistic connection between the gut microbiota, HPA and stress (Ait-Belgnaoui et al., 2012).
It was reported that gut microbiota alterations in pups can disturb the development of stress-related HPA axis function (Sudo et al., 2004). Clinically, depressive episodes are associated with dysregulation of the HPA axis (Barden, 2004) and resolution of depressive systems with normalization of the HPA axis (Heuser et al., 1996; Nickel et al., 2003). A direct link between microbiota and HPA reactivity was established with the 2004 with report that showed an exaggerated corticosterone and adrenocorticotrophin response to restraint stress in germ-free mice when compared with conventionally house- specific pathogen-free mice (Sudo et al., 2004). Germ-free mice have no commensal microbiota and exhibit an undeveloped immune system (Boman, 2000; Macpherson, 2004a; Macpherson, 2004b; Tlaskalova-Hogenova et al., 2005). The use of mice raised in a germ free environment allows investigators to assess directly the contribution of the microbiota to the development of brain and body systems. This landmark study, showing increased stress reactivity in germ free mice (Sudo et al., 2004) was the catalyst for neuroscientists to consider the importance of microbiota in CNS function.
The stress response system is functionally immature at birth and continues to develop throughout the postnatal period, a developmental period coinciding with intestinal bacterial colonization. Studies using maternal separation in rats showed that neonatal stress leads to long-term changes in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota (García-Ródenas et al., 2006; O'Mahony et al., 2009), which may contribute to long-term alterations in stress reactivity and stress-related behavior observed in these rats. In support of this, concurrent treatment with probiotics (Lactobacillus sp.) during the early stress period has been shown to normalize basal corticosterone levels which are elevated following maternal separation (Gareau et al., 2007). An indirect role for microbiota in the stress response was demonstrated in an animal model of stress induced social disruption where it was shown that microbiota are necessary for some of the stress-induced changes in inflammation (Allen et al., 2012). Stress is known to increase intestinal permeability, thus affording bacteria an opportunity to translocate across the intestinal mucosa and directly access both immune cells and neuronal cells of the enteric nervous system (Gareau et al., 2008; Teitelbaum et al., 2008). This is therefore a potential pathway whereby the microbiota can influence the CNS via the immune system and ENS in the presence of stress. A recent study has shown that pretreating rats with probiotic, Lactobacillus farciminis reduced the intestinal permeability that typically results from restraint stress and also prevented associated HPA hyper- reactivity (Ait-Belgnaoui et al., 2012).
Gut microbiota and neurotransmitter signaling
Direct interference with neurotransmitter signaling may be involved in depressive disorders. It has been shown that the neurotransmitter GABA can be produced by intestinal bacteria (Barrett et al., 2012). Furthermore, probiotic bacteria can modulate depressive behavior through GABA signaling in a mouse model (Bravo et al., 2011). The other signaling pathway that has been linked to depression is serotonergic signaling, where it has been shown that the serotonergic turnover is higher in the striatum in germ-free mice compared to conventional animals (Heijtz et al., 2011).
The brain neurotransmitter, the monoamine serotonin is an important regulatory factor in the gastrointestinal tract and other organ systems. More than 90% of the body’s 5-HT is synthesized in the gut where 5-HT activates as many as fourteen different 5-HT receptor subtypes (Gershon, 2007) located on enterocytes (Hoffman et al., 2012) enteric neurons (Mawe, 2013) and immune cells (Baganz, 2013). In addition, circulating platelets sequester 5-HT from the GI tract, releasing it to promote hemostasis and distributing it to various body sites (Amireault, 2013). As such, gut-derived 5-HT regulates diverse functions including enteric motor and secretory reflexes (Gershon, 2007), platelet aggregation (Mercado et al., 2013), immune responses (Baganz, 2013), bone development (Chabbi-Achengli et al., 2012; Yadav et al., 2008) and cardiac function (Coˆ te´ et al., 2003). Furthermore, dysregulation of peripheral 5-HT is implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases including irritable bowel syndrome (Stasi et al., 2014), cardiovascular disease (Ramage, 2008) and osteoporosis (Ducy, 2010).
The molecular mechanisms controlling the metabolism of gut 5-HT remain unclear. In the gastro intestinal tract, 5-HT is synthesized by specialized endocrine cells, called enterochromaffin cells (ECs), as well as mucosal mast cells and myenteric neurons (Gershon, 2007), but the functions of these different pools of gut 5-HT are incompletely understood. In addition, two different isoenzymes of tryptophan hydroxylase namely Tph1 and Tph2 mediate non-neuronal versus neuronal 5-HT biosynthesis (Walther et al., 2003) but little is known regarding the endogenous signals that regulate Tph expression and activity.
Psychobiotics and depression
Psychobiotics were previously defined as live bacteria (probiotics) which, when ingested, confer mental health benefits through interactions with commensal gut bacteria. Also, prebiotics, which enhance the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, is included in this category.
Probiotics, beneficial bacteria that yield positive health outcomes, have received particular attention. There was an evaluation for the efforts to manipulate commensal gut bacteria with psychobiotics. These psychobiotics were first defined as probiotics that, when ingested in appropriate quantities, yield positive psychiatric effects in psychopathology (Dinan et al., 2013). The bacteria most frequently exploited as probiotics are the gram-positive Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus families (Burnet, 2013; Mayer et al., 2014). With the presence of such bacteria, the immune system learns to distinguish to between pro- and anti- inflammatory entities and develops appropriate immunogenic responses by identifying pro-inflammatory elements as antigenic (Sansonetti et al., 2009).
Psychophysiological effects of psychobiotics
Much psychobiotic research is based on rodent models which use rodent stress inductions and rodent behavioural tests to assess motivation, anxiety, and depression. Psychobiotics applied to rodent models of illness, infection and neurodegeneration also provide early clinical insight into human diseases.
The psychophysiological effects of psychobiotics fall into the following three categories: (i) Psychological effects on emotional and cognitive processes. (ii) Systemic effects on the HPA axis and the glucocorticoid stress response and inflammation (Dowlati et al., 2010). (iii) Neural effects on neurotransmitters and proteins. Relevant neurotransmitters include gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate and proteins include brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) which plays a crucial role in learning and memory processes including spatial learning, extinction of conditioned fear and object recognition (Heldt et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2008). BDNF is reduced in anxiety and depression, a reduction that is reversible through antidepressant action (Martinowich, 2008).
Psychobiotics and brain signalling
The mechanisms through which psychobiotics exert their effects have yet to be clearly defined and remain poorly understood. Though there are some studies that provide mechanistic insights for humans, the majority of research is based on rodent models. A crucial step in developing knowledge of the mechanisms lies in investigating how the microbiome and the brain communicate with one another (Sarkar et al., 2016).
Psychobiotics and enteric nervous system interactions
Gut bacteria could regulate electrophysiological thresholds in enteric nervous system neurons. e.g. myenteric neurons exposed to Bifidobacterium longum fermented substances showed reduced generation of action potentials when they were electrically stimulated (Bercik et al., 2011b). Similarly, colonic neurons treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus showed increased excitability, an effect that emerged from inhibition of calcium-controlled potassium gates (Kunze et al., 2009). Other work showed that neurons from the dorsal root ganglion in the colon did not display hyper-excitability in response to noxious stimulation if they had been treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Cryan, 2012; Ma et al., 2009). Myenteric neurons are also in close proximity to the gut lumen (Foster, 2013), which would facilitate their contact with the microbiome. In germfree mice, these neurons show lower levels of excitability compared to their normally- colonised counterparts (McVey, 2013). One study found evidence of intestinal neural abnormalities in the jejunum and ileum of germ-free mice in comparison to controls (Collins et al., 2014), with germ- free mice showing reduced nerve density, fewer nerves per ganglion and a greater number of myenteric nitrergic neurons. Recent evidence also indicates that the microbiome affects ion transport controlled by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) (Lomasney et al., 2014).
Overall, these results provide striking evidence of direct, bacteria-induced modulation of the enteric nervous system. Moreover, the influence of the microbiome on the enteric nervous system extends beyond neurons with recent findings demonstrating that gut bacteria also play a crucial role in the development and homeostasis of glial populations in the gut (Kabouridis et al., 2015).
It has been found that gut bacteria also produce a range of neurotransmitters through the metabolism of indigestible fibres. These include dopamine and noradrenaline by members of the Bacillus family, GABA by the Bifidobacteria family, serotonin by the Enterococcus and Streptococcus families, noradrenaline and serotonin by the Escherichia family, and GABA and acetylcholine by the Lactobacilli family (Barrett et al., 2012; Dinan et al., 2015; Lyte, 2011). Though there is no direct evidence as of yet, it is likely that these neurotransmitters modulate synaptic activity in the proximal neurons of the enteric nervous system, and is an important avenue for future research.
Psychobiotics, vagal signalling and depression
Stimulating the vagus nerve exerts anti-inflammatory effects (Borovikova et al., 2000) and is used therapeutically for refractory depression. There is also evidence of both antidepressants and anxiolytics exerting vagal effects (Adinoff et al., 1992; Salam, 2004; Smith et al., 2014), suggesting that vagal modulation may be a common pathway for the effects of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and psychobiotics. Several animal studies have found that the vagus nerve mediates the relationship between psychobiotics and their psychophysiological effects, as severing the vagus nerve abolishes responses to psychobiotic administration (Bercik et al., 2011a; Bravo et al., 2011; De Lartigue et al., 2011). It has been reported that antimicrobials could increase intrinsic relative abundance of Lactobacilli in innately anxious male BALB/c mice, a change that was accompanied by increased exploratory behaviour and BDNF expression.
Although it is unclear to what extent the small fraction of SCFAs crossing into the central nervous system modulates neurotransmission, there is some evidence for their psychotropic properties at pharmacological concentrations. It has been reported that the systemic sodium butyrate injections could produce antidepressant effects in rats by increasing central serotonin neurotransmission and BDNF expression (Sun et al., 2016).
The microbiome has also been shown to possess a substantial role in generating metabolites that enter circulation and exert a range of consequences outside the gut (Morris et al., 2016). Similarly, gut bacteria crucially affect the metabolism of tryptophan into serotonin in enterochromaffin cells. Though the specific mechanism through which bacteria might control serotonin production in enterochromaffin cells was unknown at that time, a recent study has attributed this role to indigenous spore-forming bacteria in the gut (Yano et al., 2015). There were similarly dramatic differences in other tryptophan metabolites, especially those containing indole such as the antioxidant indole-3- propionic acid (IPA) and indoxyl sulphate which were undetected in the germ-free mice and whose production was therefore interpreted as being fully mediated by gut bacteria. It has been assumed that these metabolites are sensitive to psychobiotic action. However, the relationships between the microbiome, bacteria-derived metabolites, and the central nervous system as well as the role of psychobiotics in modulating this network, remain virtually unexplored (Sarkar et al., 2016).
Gut microbes can communicate with the enteric nervous system and the innate immune system via interactions between the a microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMPs) and pattern-recognition receptors embedded along the lumen. The MAMPs of beneficial bacteria by triggering pattern-recognition receptors may precipitate secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10 (Chu, 2013; O’Mahony et al., 2005). While rigorous mechanistic descriptions of the relationship between MAMPs, pattern- recognition receptors and reductions in inflammation are lacking. One intriguing hypothesis is that beneficial bacteria might serve as physical barriers that block pathogenic MAMPs from activating host pattern- recognition receptors such as TLR2 and TLR4 by binding to them instead, thereby preventing pro-inflammatory responses (Zhou et al., 2015).
Prebiotics may act in a similar capacity, as there is evidence of direct interaction between oligosaccharides and the epithelium, independent of gut bacteria, with substantial reductions in pro-inflammatory cytokines (Bode et al., 2004; Eiwegger et al., 2010). Prebiotics may prevent pathogenic MAMPs from accessing pattern-recognition receptors, either by acting as physical barriers to reduce the incidence of MAMP binding, or by directly binding to the receptor themselves. Thus, prebiotics need not exert all of their beneficial effects exclusively by growing commensal bacteria.
It has been reported that Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 and Lactobacillus GG (O’Mahony et al., 2005; Pessi et al., 2000) have been shown to enhance concentrations of interleukin-10. By reducing the total quantity of pro-inflammatory cytokines, either directly or by increasing anti- inflammatory cytokines, psychobiotics may be reducing the probability of cytokines gaining access to the central nervous system and may also be restoring inflammation- induced permeability of the blood-brain barrier (Banks, 2010; De Vries et al., 1996; Ek et al., 2001).
A parasitic infection study (Bercik et al., 2010) yielded an important mechanistic insight regarding cytokine roles in microbiome-brain signalling. Healthy male mice were infected with the Trichuris muris parasite, following which they were treated with Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001, Lactobacillus rhamnosus NCC4007 or vehicle. Infection increased anxious behaviour and reduced hippocampal BDNF mRNA levels. Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduced anxious behaviour and normalised BDNF mRNA concentrations. However, these changes occurred in the absence of prebiotic-induced reductions in any pro-inflammatory cytokines. This may be interpreted as evidence that psychobiotic effects also occur through mechanisms other than cytokine reduction.
The microbiome also controls the development of appropriate immunosuppression in response to dietary antigens through the production of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Kim et al., 2016). These cells prevent full immunogenic reactions to normal nutritional input whereas germ-free mice do not possess this immunosuppressive activity and show exaggerated immune responses to dietary antigens.
Glucocorticoids and gut barrier
Though stress is not a signalling pathway as such, it nonetheless constitutes an important influence on structural and functional aspects of the microbiome (Bharwani et al., 2016). Glucocorticoids dysregulate gut barrier function, reducing the integrity of the epithelium and permitting outward migration of bacteria (Söderholm et al., 2001), triggering inflammatory immune responses. Bacterial migration outside the lumen could also directly modulate inflammation by raising the concentrations of pro- inflammatory cell elements such as lipopolysaccharide, (Santos et al., 2001; Söderholm et al., 2001; Mass et al., 2008) a process associated with human depression (Mass et al., 2008; Maes et al., 2012). Probiotic supplementation with the Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus families is able to restore gut-barrier integrity and reduce stress-induced gut leakiness in mice and rats (Ait-Belgnaoui et al., 2012; Zareie et al., 2006).
However, both effects on glucocorticoids and cytokines as mechanisms of action for psychobiotic - induced benefits follow ceiling-effect logic. These are reasonable mechanisms for therapeutic benefits in cases of inflammation, stress or poor gut- barrier function at baseline, but cannot explain the benefits observed in healthy groups where these abnormalities are presumably absent (Messaoudi et al., 2011;Schmidt et al., 2015; Tillisch et al., 2013).
It has been concluded from significant progress in recognizing the importance of gut microbiota to brain function that alterations in microbiota could influence behaviour, anxiety and depressive-like behaviours, raising the possibility that innovative approaches in gut microbiota could be useful in treating the neuropsychiatric disorders including depression.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Adinoff B, Mefford I, Waxman R, Linnoila M. 1992. Vagal tone decreases following intravenous diazepam. Psychiatry Research: 41, 89-97.
Ait-Belgnaoui A, Durand H, Cartier C, Chaumaz G, Eutamene H, Ferrier L. 2012. Prevention of gut leakiness by a probiotic treatment leads to attenuated HPA response to an acute psychological stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37: 1885-1895.
Alam M, Midtvedt T, Uribe A. 1994. Differential cell kinetics in the ileum and colon of germfree rats. Scandinavian Journal Gastroenterology, 29: 445-451.
Allen RG, Lafuse WP, Galley JD, Ali MM, Ahmer BM, Bailey MT. 2012. The intestinal microbiota are necessary for stressor-induced enhancement of splenic macrophage microbicidal activity. Brain Behaviour and Immunity, 26: 371-382.
Amireault P, Sibon D, Coˆ te´ F. 2013. Life without peripheral serotonin: insights from tryptophan hydroxylase 1 knockout mice reveal the existence of paracrine/autocrine serotonergic networks. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 4: 64- 71.
Artis D, Wang ML, Keilbaugh SA, He W, Brenes M. 2004. RELM beta/FIZZ2 is a goblet cell-specific immune-effector molecule in the gastrointestinal tract. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 101: 13596-13600.
Baddini Feitoza A, Fernandes Pereira A, Ferreira da Costa N, Gonçalves Ribeiro B. 2009. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA): effect modulation of body composition and lipid profile. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 24: 422-428.
Baganz NL, Blakely RD. 2013. A dialogue between the immune system and brain, spoken in the language of serotonin. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 4: 48-63.
Banasaz M, Norin E, Holma R, Midtvedt T. 2002. Increased enterocyte production in gnotobiotic rats mono-associated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68: 3031-3034.
Banks WA, Erickson MA. 2010. The blood–brain barrier and immune function and dysfunction. Neurobiology of Disease, 37: 26-32.
Barden N. 2004. Implication of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the physiopathology of depression. Journal of Psychiatry Neuroscience, 29: 185-193.
Barrett E, Ross RP, O'toole PW, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. 2012. γ-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113: 411-417.
Beaton EA, Schmidt LA, Ashbaugh AR, Santesso DL, Antony MM, McCabe RE. 2006. Low salivary cortisol levels among socially anxious young adults: preliminary evidence from a selected and a non-selected sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 41: 1217-28.
Bercik P, Verdu EF, Foster JA, Macri J, Potter M, Huang X. 2010. Chronic gastrointestinal inflammation induces anxiety-like behavior and alters central nervous system biochemistry in mice. Gastroenterology: 139, 2102-2112.
Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J. 2011a. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology, 141; 599-609.
Bercik P, Park AJ, Sinclair D, Khoshdel A, Lu J, Huang X. 2011b. The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut– brain communication. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 23: 1132-1139.
Bharwani A, Mian MF, Foster JA, Surette MG, Bienenstock J, Forsythe P. 2016. Structural & functional consequences of chronic psychosocial stress on the microbiome & host. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63: 217-227.
Bisgaard H, Li N, Bonnelykke K, Chawes BL, Skov T, PaludanMüller G. 2011. Reduced diversity of the intestinal microbiota during infancy is associated with increased risk of allergic disease at school age. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 128: 646-652.
Bode L, Kunz C, Muhly-Reinholz M, Mayer K, Seeger W, Rudloff S. 2004. Inhibition of monocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells by human milk oligosaccharides. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 92: 1402-1410.
Boman HG. 2000. Innate immunity and the normal microflora. Immunological Review. 173: 5-16.
Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, Yang H, Botchkina GI, Watkins LR. 2000. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature, 405: 458-462.
Braniste V, Al-Asmakh M, Kowal C, Anuar F, Abbaspour A, Toth M. 2014. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Science Translational Medicine, 6: 158.
Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG. 2011. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 108: 16050-16055.
Burnet PW, Cowen PJ. 2013. Psychobiotics highlight the pathways to happiness. Biological Psychiatry, 74: 708-709.
Cani PD, Possemiers S, Van de Wiele T, Guiot Y, Everard A. 2009. Changes in gut microbiota control inflammation in obese mice through a mechanism involving GLP-2-driven improvement of gut permeability. Gut, 58: 1091- 1103.
Cario E, Gerken G, Podolsky DK. 2007. Toll-like receptor 2 controls mucosal inflammation by regulating epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology, 132: 1359-1374.
Chabbi-Achengli Y, Coudert AE, Callebert J, Geoffroy V, Coˆ te´ F, Collet C. 2012. Decreased osteoclastogenesis in serotonin deficient mice. Proceedings of Natural Academic Science, 109: 2567-2572.
Chu H, Mazmanian SK. 2013. Innate immune recognition of the microbiota promotes host-microbial symbiosis. Nature Immunology, 14: 668-675.
Clayton TA, Baker D, Lindon JC, Everett JR, Nicholson JK. 2009. Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 106: 14728-14733.
Collins, J, Borojevic R, Verdu EF, Huizinga JD, Ratcliffe EM. 2014. Intestinal microbiota influence the early postnatal development of the enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 26: 98-107.
Coˆ te´ F, Thevenot E, Fligny C, Fromes Y, Darmon M, Ripoche MA. 2003. Disruption of the nonneuronal tph1 gene demonstrates the importance of peripheral serotonin in cardiac function. Proceedings of Natural Academy of Sciences, 100: 13525-13530.
Cryan JF, Dinan TG. 2012. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nature Review Neuroscience, 13: 701-712.
De Kloet ER, Joels M, Holsboer F. 2005. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6: 463-75.
De la Torre-Ubieta L, Won H, Stein JL, Geschwind DH. 2016. Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics. Nature Medicine , 22: 345-361.
De Lartigue G, De La Serre CB, Raybould HE. 2011. Vagal afferent neurons in high fat diet induced obesity; intestinal microflora, gut inflammation and cholecystokinin. Physiology and Behaviour, 105: 100-105.
De Theije CGM, Bavelaar BM, Lopes da Silva S, Korte, SM, Olivier B, Garssen J, Kraneveld AD. 2014. Food allergy and food-based therapies in neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatric Allergy Immunology, 25: 218-226.
Devillard E, McIntosh FM, Duncan SH, Wallace RJ. 2007. Metabolism of linoleic acid by human gut bacteria: different routes for biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid. Journal of Bacteriology, 189: 2566-2570.
Devillard E, McIntosh FM, Paillard D, Thomas NA, Shingfield KJ, Wallace RJ. 2009. Differences between human subjects in the composition of the faecal bacterial community and faecal metabolism of linoleic acid. Microbiology, 155: 513-520.
De Vries HE, Blom-Roosemalen MC, Van Ooste M, De Boer AG, Van Berkel TJ, Breimer DD, Kuiper J. 1996. The influence of cytokines on the integrity of the blood–brain barrier in vitro. Journal of Neuroimmunology, 64: 37-43.
Dinan TG, Stanton C, Cryan JF. 2013. Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biological Psychiatry, 74: 720-726.
Dinan TG, Stilling, RM, Stanton C, Cryan JF. 2015. Collective unconscious: how gut microbes shape human behavior. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 63: 1-9.
Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK, Lanctôt KL. 2010. A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 67: 446-457.
Ducy P, Karsenty G. 2010. The two faces of serotonin in bone biology. Journal of Cell Biology, 191: 7-13.
Eiwegger T, Stahl B, Haidl P, Schmitt J, Boehm G, Dehlink E. 2010. Prebiotic oligosaccharides: in vitro evidence for gastrointestinal epithelial transfer and immunomodulatory properties. Pediatric Allergy Immunology, 21: 1179-1188.
Ek M, Engblom D, Saha S, Blomqvist A, Jakobsson PJ, Ericsson-Dahlstrand A. 2001. Inflammatory response: pathway across the blood-brain barrier. Nature, 410: 430-431.
Ferreira CM, Vieira AT, Vinolo MA, Oliveira FA, Curi R, Martins Fdos S. 2014. The central role of the gut microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases. Journal of Immunology Research. 2014: 689492.
Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. 2013. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends in Neurosciences, 36: 305-312.
Fukiya S, Arata M, Kawashima H, Yoshida D, Kaneko M, Minamida K. 2009. Conversion of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid into their 7-oxo derivatives by Bacteroides intestinalis AM-1 isolated from human feces. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 293: 263-270.
García-Ródenas CL, Bergonzelli GE, Nutten S, Schumann A, Cherbut C, Turini M. 2006. Nutritional approach to restore impaired intestinal barrier function and growth after neonatal stress in rats. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 43: 16-24.
Gareau MG, Jury J, MacQueen G, Sherman PM, Perdue MH. 2007. Probiotic treatment of rat pups normalises corticosterone release and ameliorates colonic dysfunction induced by maternal separation. Gut, 56: 1522-1528.
Gareau MG, Silva MA, Perdue MH. 2008. Pathophysiological mechanisms of stress induced intestinal damage. Current Molecular Medicine, 8: 274-281.
Gershon MD, Tack J. 2007. The serotonin signaling system: from basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders. Gastroenterology, 132: 397-414.
Geschwind DH, Rakic P. 2013. Cortical evolution: Judge the brain by its cover. Neuron, 80: 633-647.
Gordon HA, Bruckner-kardoss E. 1961. Effect of normal microbial flora on intestinal surface area. American Journal Physiology, 201: 175-178.
Heijtz RD, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B. 2011. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 108: 3047-3052.
Heldt SA, Stanek L, Chhatwal JP, Ressler KJ. 2007. Hippocampus-specific deletion of BDNF in adult mice impairs spatial memory and extinction of aversive memories. Molecular Psychiatry: 12, 656-670.
Heuser IJ, Schweiger U, Gotthardt U, Schmider J, Lammers CH, Dettling M. 1996. Pituitary-adrenal-system regulation and psychopathology during amitriptyline treatment in elderly depressed patients and normal comparison subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153: 93-99.
Hoban AE, Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, Shanahan F, Dinan TG. 2016. Regulation of prefrontal cortex myelination by the microbiota. Translational Psychiatry, 6: e774.
Hoffman JM, Tyler K, MacEachern SJ, Balemba OB, Johnson AC, Brooks EM. 2012. Activation of colonic mucosal 5-HT4 receptors accelerates propulsive motility and inhibits visceral hypersensitivity. Gastroenterology, 142: 844- 854.
Holtzheimer PE, Nemeroff CB. 2006. Future prospects in depression research. Dialogues in Clinical Neurosciences, 8: 175-89.
Hooper LV, Wong MH, Thelin A, Hansson L, Falk PG, Gordon JI. 2001. Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine. Science, 291: 881-884.
Husebye E, Hellström PM, Midtvedt T. 1994. Intestinal microflora stimulates myoelectric activity of rat small intestine by promoting cyclic initiation and aboral propagation of migrating myoelectric complex. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 39: 946-956.
Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C, Vuyyuru H, Sasikala M, Reddy DN. 2015. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 21(29): 8787-8803.
Kabouridis PS, Lasrado R, McCallum S, Chng SH, Snippert HJ, Clevers H. 2015. Microbiota controls the homeostasis of glial cells in the gut lamina propria. Neuron, 85: 289-295.
Karlsson F, Tremaroli V, Nielsen J, Bäckhed F. 2013. Assessing the human gut microbiota in metabolic diseases. Diabetes, 62: 3341-3349.
Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G. 2014. Irritable bowel syndrome: a microbiome-gut-brain axis disorder? World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20: 14105- 14125.
Keshavarzian A, Green SJ, Engen PA, Voigt RM, Naqib A, Forsyth, CB, Mutlu E, Shannon KM. 2015. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 30: 1351-1360.
Kim KS, Hong SW, Han D, Yi J, Jung J, Yang BG. 2016. Dietary antigens limit mucosal immunity by inducing regulatory T cells in the small intestine. Science, 351: 858-863.
Krajmalnik-Brown R, Lozupone C, Kang DW, Adams JB. 2015. Gut bacteria in children with autism spectrum disorders: challenges and promise of studying how a complex community influences a complex disease. Microbiol Ecology in Health and Disease, 26: 26914.
Kunze WA, Mao YK, Wang B, Huizinga JD, Ma X, Forsythe P, Bienenstock J. 2009. Lactobacillus reuteri enhances excitability of colonic AH neurons by inhibiting calcium-dependent potassium channel opening. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 13: 2261-2270.
Lomasney KW, Houston A, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Hyland NP. 2014. Selective influence of host microbiota on cAMP-mediated ion transport in mouse colon. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 26: 887-888.
Lutgendorff F, Akkermans LM, Söderholm JD. 2008. The role of microbiota and probiotics in stress-induced gastro-intestinal damage. Current Molecular Medicine, 8: 282-298.
Lu Y, Christian K, Lu B. 2008. BDNF: a key regulator for protein synthesis dependent LTP and long-term memory? Neurobiology of Learning Memory, 89: 312- 323.
Lyte M. 2011. Probiotics function mechanistically as delivery vehicles for neuroactive compounds: microbial endocrinology in the design and use of probiotics. Bioessays, 33: 574-581.
Ma X, Mao YK, Wang B, Huizinga JD, Bienenstock J, Kunze W. 2009. Lactobacillus reuteri ingestion prevents hyperexcitability of colonic DRG neurons induced by noxious stimuli. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal Liver Physiololgy, 296: G868-G875.
Macfarlane S, Macfarlane GT. 2003. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proceedings of Nutrition Society, 62: 67-72.
Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. 2004a. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nature Reviews Immunology, 4: 478-485.
Macpherson AJ, Uhr T. 2004b. Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria. Science, 303: 1662-1665.
Maes M, Kubera M, Leunis JC, Berk M. 2012. Increased IgA and IgM responses against gut commensals in chronic depression: further evidence for increased bacterial translocation or leaky gut. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141: 55-62.
Marin O, Rubenstein JL. 2003. Cell migration in the forebrain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 26: 441-483.
Martinowich K, Lu B. 2008. Interaction between BDNF and serotonin: role in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33: 73-83.
Mass M, Kubera M, Leunis JC. 2008. The gut–brain barrier in major depression: intestinal mucosal dysfunction with an increased translocation of LPS from gram negative enterobacteria (leaky gut) plays a role in the inflammatory pathophysiology of depression. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 29: 117-124.
Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. 2013. Serotonin signalling in the gut–functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology Hepatology, 10: 473-486.
Mayer EA, Knight R, Mazmanian SK, Cryan JF, Tillisch K. 2014. Gut microbes and the brain: paradigm shift in neuroscience. Journal of Neuroscience, 34: 15490- 15496.
McVey Neufeld KA, Mao YK, Bienenstock J, Foster JA, Kunze WA. 2013. The microbiome is essential for normal gut intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability in the mouse. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 25: 183-188.
Mercado CP, Quintero MV, Li Y, Singh P, Byrd AK, Talabnin K. 2013. A serotonin-induced N-glycan switch regulates platelet aggregation. Scientific Reports, 3: 2795.
Messaoudi M, Lalonde R, Violle N, Javelot H, Desor D, Nejdi A. 2011. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. British Journal of Nutrition, 105: 755-764.
Morris G, Berk M, Carvalho A, Caso JR, Sanz Y, Walder K. 2016. The role of the microbial metabolites including tryptophan catabolites and short chain fatty acids in the pathophysiology of immune-inflammatory and neuroimmune disease. Molecular Neurobiology, 54: 4432-4451.
Nickel T, Sonntag A, Schill J, Zobel AW, Ackl N, Brunnauer A. 2003. Clinical and neurobiological effects of tianeptine and paroxetine in major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacolgy, 23: 155-168.
O’Mahony L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, Hurley G, Luo F, Chen K. 2005. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology, 128: 541- 551.
O'Mahony SM, Marchesi JR, Scully P, Codling C, Ceolho AM, Quigley EM. 2009. Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biological Psychiatry, 65: 263-267.
Parikshak NN, Gandal MJ, Geschwind DH. 2015. Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16: 441-458.
Podolsky DK, Lynch-Devaney K, Stow JL, Oates P, Murgue B, DeBeaumont M, Sands BE, Mahida YR. 1993. Identification of human intestinal trefoil factor. Goblet cell-specific expression of a peptide targeted for apical secretion. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268: 6694-6702.
Pessi TYME, Sütas Y, Hurme M, Isolauri E. 2000. Interleukin-10 generation in atopic children following oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 30: 1804-1808.
Ramage AG, Villalon CM. 2008. 5-hydroxytryptamine and cardiovascular regulation. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 29: 472-481.
Rea K, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. 2014. The microbiome: A key regulator of stress and neuroinflammation. Neurobiology of Stress: 4, 23-33.
Saha JR, Butler VP, Neu HC, Lindenbaum J. 1983. Digoxin-inactivating bacteria: identification in human gut flora. Science, 220: 325-327.
Salam OMA. 2004. Fluoxetine and sertraline stimulate gastric acid secretion via a vagal pathway in anaesthetised rats. Pharmacological Research, 50: 309-316.
Sansonetti PJ, Medzhitov R. 2009. Learning tolerance while fighting ignorance. Cell, 138: 416-420.
Santos J, Yang PC, Söderholm JD, Benjamin M, Perdue MH. 2001. Role of mast cells in chronic stress induced colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction in the rat. Gut, 48: 630-636.
Sarkar A, Lehto SM, Harty S, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Burnet PWJ. 2016. Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria-gut-brain signals Trends. Neuroscience, 39: 763-781.
Sartor RB. 2008. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology, 134: 577-594.
Schmidt K, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ, Tzortzis G, Errington S, Burnet PW. 2015. Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 232: 1793-1801.
Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Finlay BB. 2010. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiological Reviews, 90: 859-904.
Severance EG, Yolken RH, Eaton WW. 2014. Autoimmune diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and the microbiome in schizophrenia: more than a gut feeling. Schizophrenia Research, 176: 23-35.
Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. 2016. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell, 167: 915-932.
Smith R, Allen JJ, Thayer JF, Fort C, Lane RD. 2014. Increased association over time between regional frontal lobe BOLD change magnitude and cardiac vagal control with sertraline treatment for major depression. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 224: 225-233.
Söderholm JD, Perdue M.H. 2001. Stress and intestinal barrier function. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 280: G7-G13.
Stasi C, Bellini M, Bassotti G, Blandizzi C, Milani S. 2014. Serotonin receptors and their role in the pathophysiology and therapy of irritable bowel syndrome. Techniques in Coloproctology, 18: 613-621.
Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN. 2004. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. The Journal of Physiology, 558: 263-275.
Sun J, Wang F, Hong G, Pang M, Xu H, Li H, Tian F. 2016. Antidepressant-like effects of sodium butyrate and its possible mechanisms of action in mice exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. Neuroscience Letters, 618: 159-166.
Teitelbaum AA, Gareau MG, Jury J, Yang PC, Perdue MH. 2008. Chronic peripheral administration of corticotropin-releasing factor causes colonic barrier dysfunction similar to psychological stress. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 295: G452-G459.
Tillisch K, Labus J, Kilpatrick L, Jiang Z, Stains J, Ebrat B. 2013. Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity. Gastroenterology, 144: 1394-1401.
Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Tucková, L., Stepánková, R., Hudcovic, T., Palová J, Kozáková H. 2005. Involvement of innate immunity in the development of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Annals of the Newyork Academy of Sciences, 1051: 787- 798.
Uher R, McGufﬁn P. 2010. The moderation by the serotonin transporter gene of environmental adversity in the etiology of depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 15: 18 -22.
Walker EF, Diforio D. 1997. Schizophrenia: a neural diathesis-stress model. Psychological Review, 104: 667-85.
Wallace BD, Wang H, Lane KT, Scott JE, Orans J, Koo JS. 2010. Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme. Science, 330: 831-835.
Walther DJ, Peter JU, Bashammakh S, Hortnagl H, Voits M, Fink H. 2003. Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science, 299: 76.
Yadav VK, Ryu JH, Suda N, Tanaka KF, Gingrich JA, Schutz G. 2008. Lrp5 controls bone formation by inhibiting serotonin synthesis in the duodenum. Cell, 135: 825-837.
Yan F, Cao H, Cover TL, Washington MK, Shi Y, Liu L. 2011. Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 121: 2242-2253.
Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, Shastri GG, Ann P, Ma L. 2015. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell, 161: 264-276.
Zareie M, Johnson-Henry K, Jury J, Yang P.C, Ngan BY, McKay DM. 2006. Probiotics prevent bacterial translocation and improve intestinal barrier function in rats following chronic psychological stress. Gut, 55: 1553-1560.
Zhou W, Lv H, Li MX, Su H, Huang LG, Li J, Yuan WM. 2015. Protective effects of bifidobacteria on intestines in newborn rats with necrotizing enterocolitis and its regulation on TLR2 and TLR4. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14: 11505-11514.